These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed


  • Title: Hospital Authority audit of the outcome of endoscopic resection of superficial upper gastro-intestinal lesions in Hong Kong.
    Author: Teoh AY, Chiu PW, Chan SY, Cheung FK, Chu KM, Kao SS, Lai TW, Lau CW, Law SY, Leung CT, Leung WK, Tong DK, Tsang SH.
    Journal: Hong Kong Med J; 2015 Jun; 21(3):224-31. PubMed ID: 25999031.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVES: To review the short-term outcome of endoscopic resection of superficial upper gastro-intestinal lesions in Hong Kong. DESIGN: Historical cohort study. SETTING: All Hospital Authority hospitals in Hong Kong. PATIENTS: This was a multicentre retrospective study of all patients who underwent endoscopic resection of superficial upper gastro-intestinal lesions between January 2010 and June 2013 in all government-funded hospitals in Hong Kong. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Indication of the procedures, peri-procedural and procedural parameters, oncological outcomes, morbidity, and mortality. RESULTS: During the study period, 187 lesions in 168 patients were resected. Endoscopic mucosal resection was performed in 34 (18.2%) lesions and endoscopic submucosal dissection in 153 (81.8%) lesions. The mean size of the lesions was 2.6 (standard deviation, 1.8) cm. The 30-day morbidity rate was 14.4%, and perforations and severe bleeding occurred in 4.3% and 3.2% of the patients, respectively. Among patients who had dysplasia or carcinoma, R0 resection was achieved in 78% and the piecemeal resection rate was 11.8%. Lateral margin involvement was 14% and vertical margin involvement was 8%. Local recurrence occurred in 9% of patients and 15% had residual disease. The 2-year overall survival rate and disease-specific survival rate was 90.6% and 100%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection were introduced in low-to-moderate-volume hospitals with acceptable morbidity rates. The short-term survival was excellent. However, other oncological outcomes were higher than those observed in high-volume centres and more secondary procedures were required.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]