These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Reduction of radiation exposure during atrial fibrillation ablation using a novel fluoroscopy image integrated 3-dimensional electroanatomic mapping system: A prospective, randomized, single-blind, and controlled study.
    Author: Huo Y, Christoph M, Forkmann M, Pohl M, Mayer J, Salmas J, Sitzy J, Wunderlich C, Piorkowski C, Gaspar T.
    Journal: Heart Rhythm; 2015 Sep; 12(9):1945-55. PubMed ID: 26001508.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: We explored whether the use of a novel fluoroscopy image integrated 3-dimensional electroanatomic mapping (F-EAM) system could result in a reduction of overall fluoroscopy time and radiation doses during the whole procedure of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. METHODS: Eighty patients (44 men (55%); mean age 63 ± 10 years) who underwent catheter ablation due to paroxysmal AF were recruited consecutively in the present study. Patients were randomized (1:1) into 2 arms for AF ablation: one using a conventional 3-dimensional electroanatomical mapping (EAM) system and the other using the F-EAM system. RESULTS: Fluoroscopy time (10:42 [interquartile range {IQR} 8:45-12:46] minutes:seconds vs 1:45 [IQR 1:05-2:22] minutes:seconds; P < .001) and radiation doses (2440 [IQR 1593-3091] cGy·cm(2) vs 652 [IQR 326-1489] cGy·cm(2); P < .001) in the EAM group were significantly greater than those in the F-EAM group. The majority of reduction of radiation exposure was achieved after transseptal puncture, which was near-zero fluoroscopic exposure. In total, approximately 84% of fluoroscopy time and 73% of radiation doses have been reduced during the AF ablation procedure using the F-EAM system compared to using the conventional EAM system. However, procedure time did not differ significantly (1:39 [IQR 1:18-2:10] hours:minutes vs 1:37 [IQR 1:17-1:50] hours:minutes; P = .362). During follow-up (5.9 ± 1.3 months), 61 patients (76.3%) had no recurrence of atrial arrhythmias. The recurrence rate between the 2 groups did not differ. CONCLUSION: AF catheter ablation using the F-EAM system was safe and resulted in a significant reduction of radiation exposure to patients and staff without complicating the workflow of the procedure. A near-zero fluoroscopic catheter ablation procedure could be performed without compromising acute/mid-term efficacy and safety.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]