These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Predictive value for paravalvular regurgitation of 3-dimensional anatomic aortic annulus shape assessed by multidetector computed tomography post-transcatheter aortic valve replacement.
    Author: Ciobotaru V, Maupas E, Dürrleman N, Boulenc JM, Borton A, Pujadas-Berthault P, Rioux P, Maubon A.
    Journal: Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Jan; 17(1):85-95. PubMed ID: 26003147.
    Abstract:
    AIMS: Paravalvular regurgitation (PAR) remains a serious complication after trans-catheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Multidetector computed tomography (MDCT)-based measurements of the aortic basal virtual ring (BVR) are considered the gold standard for trans-catheter heart valve (THV) sizing. However, the real anatomic aortic annulus is a 3-dimensional structure. To compare measurement of 3D-anatomic annulus with BVR and secondly to assess independent predictive parameters that may impact on PAR > mild post-TAVR (PAR+). METHODS AND RESULTS: MDCT was performed in 92 patients before and after balloon or self-expandable TAVR. 3D-AA shape was obtained point by point following the semilunar attachment of aortic cusps (Osirix-MD 2.8.2). 3D-oversizing index (nominal THV area/3D-AA area - 1) × 100 was calculated as well as 2D-oversizing index using BVR area instead of 3D-AA area. PAR was quantified by planimetry of vena-contracta in transthoracic echocardiography short-axis view. Valvular calcium volume and annulus calcium area were measured using Hounsfield-intensity detection. ROC curves and logistic regression for PAR(+) were performed. BVR area overall underestimated 3D-AA area by 19 ± 9% (P< 0.001), significantly more in PAR(+) (26 ± 7%) vs. PAR(-) (17 ± 9%, P< 0.001). 3D-oversizing index had greater predictive value for PAR > mild (area under the curve, AUC = 0.88) with 88% sensibility (Se) and 82% specificity (Sp) than 2D-oversizing index (AUC = 0.68) with 84% Se, but only 41% Sp (P< 0.0001). Also, valvular calcium volume and annulus calcium area were less predictors for PAR > mild (AUC = 0.68, respectively, AUC = 0.75, P = 0.002). In a multivariate analysis, only 3D-oversizing index showed an independent value for PAR > mild (OR = 18.6, P< 0.001). CONCLUSION: Basal ring CT measurement significantly underestimated the real 3D-anatomic aortic annulus area. This may impact on THV sizing and PAR incidence. 3D-oversizing index is the most predictive factor for PAR > mild.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]