These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: The effectiveness of a counter-rotary action powered toothbrush and conventional toothbrush on plaque removal and gingival bleeding. A short term study.
    Author: Killoy WJ, Love JW, Love J, Fedi PF, Tira DE.
    Journal: J Periodontol; 1989 Aug; 60(8):473-7. PubMed ID: 2600755.
    Abstract:
    Initial investigations have demonstrated the effectiveness of a new contra-rotary powered electric toothbrush in removing plaque supragingivally, subgingivally, and interproximally following a single use. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a counter-rotary toothbrush following 1) one time instruction, 2) reinstruction and 1 week practice; and 3) a third instruction and 3 weeks of practice and home use. Twenty-four patients were studied; 12 using the counter-rotary toothbrush and 12 using a conventional toothbrush. Using O'Leary and Turesky plaque indices, both brushes significantly reduced supragingival plaque from baseline at all intervals. The counter-rotary brush, however, was more efficient than the conventional brush at all intervals (P less than 0.01). Using a Surface Area Plaque Index, both brushes significantly reduced supragingival plaque from baseline at all intervals but there were no significant differences between brushes. A timed bleeding index showed significant reduction in gingival bleeding following 28 days of brushing with both brushes. Again, the counter-rotary toothbrush was superior to the conventional toothbrush (P less than 0.01).
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]