These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Role of intravenous immune globulin in streptococcal toxic shock syndrome and Clostridium difficile infection.
    Author: Shah PJ, Vakil N, Kabakov A.
    Journal: Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2015 Jun 15; 72(12):1013-9. PubMed ID: 26025992.
    Abstract:
    PURPOSE: The use of intravenous immune globulin (IVIG) in the management of streptococcal toxic shock syndrome (STSS) and Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is reviewed. SUMMARY: IVIG has a wide range of uses in clinical practice, including STSS and CDI. It is an attractive option for these two infections because both infections are toxin mediated, and IVIG may contain antibodies that neutralize these toxins. For STSS and CDI, IVIG is often considered for use in critically ill patients who are not responding to traditional therapies. Several encouraging case reports and retrospective chart reviews have been published, highlighting the potential benefit of IVIG in such patients. However, its definitive role remains unclear, mainly due to the lack of high-level evidence. Data supporting its use have been extrapolated from retrospective chart reviews and case reports in which profound heterogeneity in patient populations and treatment modalities exist. The use of IVIG must be weighed carefully because it is not a benign product. As with the use of IVIG for STSS, the role of IVIG for CDI is unclear. Nonetheless, IVIG may serve as a useful adjunct therapy for patients suffering from severe complicated CDI (shock, ileus, or megacolon) who do not respond to conventional treatment. Adverse reactions to IVIG are mild and transitory and occur during or immediately after drug infusion. CONCLUSION: Although randomized, controlled trials supporting the use of IVIG for STSS and CDI are lacking, IVIG may be considered a last-line adjunct therapy in those patients for whom the clinical benefit outweighs the potential adverse effects of therapy.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]