These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Standards of morphological development in fetuses and newborns as a method of defining fetal age.
    Author: Cieślik K.
    Journal: Z Morphol Anthropol; 1989; 78(1):133-42. PubMed ID: 2603470.
    Abstract:
    Whenever the calendar age of the studied fetal material is not known we are bound to reconstruct it by replacing it with the developmental age. In this paper some common developmental standards used in the determination of fetal age are reviewed. The standards, as found in the relevant literature, are tested against a control group for their accuracy in predicting fetal age. The results indicate considerable discrepancy among the various standards. Further, the developmental ages defined by these standards often differ considerably from the known menstrual age. My own attempt to present a more reliable set of developmental standards is based on the analysis of three morphological features commonly used in biological assessment. Body weight, crown-heel length, and crown-rump length are measured in weekly termed groups representing the 20th-42nd weeks of intrauterine life. The accuracy of body weight and crown-heel length in predicting fetal age is tested both within and against a control group. Statistical analysis show no significant differences between the predicted and known fetal ages. These results indicate that body weight and crown-heel length are reliable developmental standards from which fetal age can be defined.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]