These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: In Vivo Confocal Microscopy 1 Year after Autologous Cultured Limbal Stem Cell Grafts.
    Author: Pedrotti E, Passilongo M, Fasolo A, Nubile M, Parisi G, Mastropasqua R, Ficial S, Bertolin M, Di Iorio E, Ponzin D, Marchini G.
    Journal: Ophthalmology; 2015 Aug; 122(8):1660-8. PubMed ID: 26050542.
    Abstract:
    PURPOSE: To correlate clinical, impression cytologic, and in vivo confocal microscopy findings on the corneal surface after cultured limbal stem cell transplantation. DESIGN: Prospective, interventional, noncomparative, masked case series. PARTICIPANTS: Thirteen patients with limbal stem cell deficiency after unilateral (9 eyes) or bilateral (2 eyes) chemical burn, liquid nitrogen injury (1 eye), or herpes simplex virus infection (1 eye). METHODS: Limbal cells were harvested from healthy or less affected eyes, cultured on 3T3 cells and fibrin glue, and transplanted to the patient's injured eye. Patients underwent clinical examination and impression cytologic examination of the central cornea before and 1 year after intervention. In vivo confocal microscopy scans were obtained in all corneal quadrants after 1 year. The interexamination agreement was established by calculation of the Cohen's κ coefficient. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Results of surgery were assessed considering clinical signs (successful: restoration of transparent, avascular, and stable corneal epithelium without neovascularization in central corneal surface; partially successful: recurrence of superficial neovascularization; failed: recurrent epithelial defects, pannus, and inflammation), phenotype of cells covering the corneal surface (conjunctivalized corneal surface: cytokeratin 12 [cK12]-negative and mucin 1 [MUC1]-positive cells; mixed epithelium: cK12-positive and MUC1-positive cells; corneal epithelium: cK12-positive and MUC1-negative cells), and cell morphologic features (corneal epithelium: multilayered polygonal and flat cells with hyperreflective nuclei; conjunctival epithelium: stratified cuboidal or polygonal cells, hyperreflective cytoplasm, and barely defined borders; epithelial transition: transition of epithelial cells from the cornea to the conjunctiva over the corneal surface). RESULTS: We found a moderate to substantial degree of concordance between confocal microscopy and clinical evaluation (κ = 0.768) and between confocal microscopy and impression cytologic analysis (κ = 0.629). Confocal microscopy showed that 46.2% of patients exhibited corneal epithelium in the central and peripheral cornea, 30.8% showed an irregular mixed corneal and conjunctival epithelium, and 23.0% showed conjunctival epithelium. Palisades of Vogt were absent in all (100.0%) patients, and the cornea-conjunctiva epithelial transition localized approximately 1 mm internally on the cornea. CONCLUSIONS: Confocal microscopy provides objective measures of the corneal epithelium and may significantly improve the evaluation of outcomes after cultured limbal stem cell graft.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]