These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Impact of docetaxel in addition to cisplatin and fluorouracil as neoadjuvant treatment for resectable stage III or T3 esophageal cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis.
    Author: Nomura M, Oze I, Abe T, Komori A, Narita Y, Masuishi T, Taniguchi H, Kadowaki S, Ura T, Andoh M, Kawai R, Uemura N, Ishihara M, Tanaka T, Tajika M, Niwa Y, Muro K, Muto M.
    Journal: Cancer Chemother Pharmacol; 2015 Aug; 76(2):357-63. PubMed ID: 26092324.
    Abstract:
    PURPOSE: To investigate the influence of addition of docetaxel to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) with cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil (CF) in patients with clinical stage III or T3 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. METHODS: Information about 209 esophageal cancer patients with stage III or T3 disease, who underwent NAC consisting of CF with or without docetaxel, was reviewed. The survival outcomes were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and propensity score-adjusted Cox proportional hazards models. The relevant variables were included in the propensity score model. RESULTS: NAC was administered to 149 patients in the CF group and 60 patients in the docetaxel plus CF (DCF) group. Overall, 129 patients treated with CF and 58 patients treated with DCF underwent surgery after NAC. The overall response rate was significantly higher in the DCF group compared with the CF group (61.0 vs. 43.2 %, p = 0.021). After matching, recurrence-free survival did not differ statistically between the CF and DCF groups [hazard ratio (HR) 0.83, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.50-1.37, p = 0.46]. After matching, the improvement in overall survival in the DCF group reached statistical significance (HR 0.49, 95 % CI 0.24-0.999, p = 0.050). No significant differences in rate of locoregional or distant recurrences were observed between the CF and DCF groups (53.0 vs. 48.3 %, p = 0.54). CONCLUSIONS: NAC with DCF is superior to CF in patients with clinical stage III or T3 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]