These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: X-ray quantitative computed tomography: the relations to physical properties of proximal tibial trabecular bone specimens. Author: Hvid I, Bentzen SM, Linde F, Mosekilde L, Pongsoipetch B. Journal: J Biomech; 1989; 22(8-9):837-44. PubMed ID: 2613719. Abstract: Cylindrical bone specimens from the proximal epiphysis of ten normal human proximal tibiae were randomly assigned to a destructive axial compression test-series (N = 94) or to a protocol of standardized mechanical conditioning followed by non-destructive repeated testing to 0.6% strain and a final destructive test (N = 121). Specimen X-ray quantitative computed tomography (QCT) obtained at different scanning energies (100, 120 and 140 kVp) yielded closely related results (r = 1.00). Accordingly, predictions of physically measured densities or mechanical properties were not improved by using more than one scanning energy. QCT and physically measured densities were intimately related (QCT at 140 kVp to apparent density using linear regression: r = 0.94, and to apparent ash density: r = 0.95) and did not differ significantly in their ability to predict the mechanical properties, thus favouring the more easily implemented QCT for routine work. Evaluation of the relation of apparent density to Young's modulus and ultimate strength suggested that a power law regression model is preferable to a linear model, although linear model prediction of mechanical properties does not have significantly worse accuracy within the narrow density range investigated. The effect of conditioning on the behaviour of bone specimens subjected to destructive compression tests was to increase the stiffness and strength by approximately 50 and 20% respectively.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]