These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Quantification of α-Gal Antigen Removal in the Porcine Dermal Tissue by α-Galactosidase.
    Author: Gao HW, Li SB, Sun WQ, Yun ZM, Zhang X, Song JW, Zhang SK, Leng L, Ji SP, Tan YX, Gong F.
    Journal: Tissue Eng Part C Methods; 2015 Nov; 21(11):1197-204. PubMed ID: 26140655.
    Abstract:
    The α-Gal (Galα1,3-Galβ1-4GlcNAc-R) epitope, the major xenoantigen, is the first barrier in a porcine-to-man tissue and organ xenotransplantation. The elimination or reduction of the α-Gal epitopes is therefore an important step for a successful xenotransplantation. The present study is to evaluate the α-Gal elimination in the porcine skin with α-galactosidase treatment, and to assess two methods (immunohistochemistry and inhibition ELISA) that may be used in quality control for quantifying the extent of the α-Gal elimination. Enzymatic cleavage in a single-step process is extremely efficient and affordable at eliminating the α-Gal epitope even in a tissue as dense as the porcine dermis. The cost of enzymatic cleavage is found to be less than US$7 for a 10 × 10 cm piece of porcine skin (0.5 mm thick) or about US$140 for 100 g of 3-dimensional soft tissues. After enzymatic cleavage, the α-Gal-positive immunostaining was essentially undetectable in enzyme-treated porcine skin. The inhibition rate constant of the monoclonal anti-Gal antibody M86 binding to α-Gal-bovine serum albumin in ELISA was reduced from 15.0 ± 4.3 (n = 10) to 6.1 ± 2.6 (n = 7) after enzyme treatment, in comparison to 4.4 ± 1.8 (n = 9) background inhibition of decellularized human skin (the ultimate negative control), which demonstrates ∼ 84% elimination of α-Gal epitopes in treated porcine skin. To examine the suitability of two detection methods for the routine quality control application, comparative studies were made with control and enzyme-treated porcine skin, porcine skin from the α-Gal knockout animal, as well as decellularized human skin. The data show that the traditional immunohistochemistry and, to a less extent, the inhibition ELISA with further modifications can be used as quality control tools in the production and selection of biocompatible bioprosthetic devices. The biological evaluation of enzyme-treated porcine skin is ongoing with a small animal model and a nonhuman primate model.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]