These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: EUS-guided gallbladder drainage with a lumen-apposing metal stent (with video).
    Author: Irani S, Baron TH, Grimm IS, Khashab MA.
    Journal: Gastrointest Endosc; 2015 Dec; 82(6):1110-5. PubMed ID: 26142558.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Nonsurgical techniques for gallbladder drainage are percutaneous, and endoscopic. EUS-guided transmural gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD) is a relatively new approach, although data are limited. Our aim was to describe the outcome after EUS-GBD with a lumen-apposing metal stent (LAMS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective review of prospectively collected data on 15 nonsurgical patients who underwent EUS-GBD for various indications. Procedures were performed at 3 tertiary care centers with expertise in the management of complex biliary problems. The main outcome measures were technical and clinical success and adverse events. RESULTS: Fifteen patients (8 male, 7 female) with a median age of 74 years (range 42-89) underwent EUS-GBD by using a LAMS to decompress the gallbladder (7 patients calculous cholecystitis, 4 acalculous cholecystitis, 2 patients biliary obstruction, 1 patient gallbladder hydrops, 1 patient symptomatic cholelithiasis). Patients were nonsurgical candidates according to the American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification System; findings were class IV or higher in 9 patients and advanced malignancies in 6. Percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage (PT-GBD) was refused by all patients and was further precluded by perihepatic ascites in 3 patients, coagulopathy or need for anticoagulation in 4 patients, and need for internal biliary drainage in 2 patients. Transduodenal access and stenting was achieved in 14 of 15 patients and transgastric stenting was achieved in 1. Technical success was achieved in 14 of 15 patients (93%), whereas clinical success was achieved in all 15 patients with a median follow-up of 160 days. One mild adverse event (postprocedure fever for 3 days) was noted. The limitations of this study are the small select group of patients and retrospective study design. CONCLUSIONS: EUS-GBD with a LAMS is technically safe and effective for decompressing the gallbladder for cholecystitis and biliary or cystic duct obstruction in patients who are poor surgical candidates.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]