These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed


  • Title: The effectiveness of bedside point-of-care ultrasonography in the diagnosis and management of metacarpal fractures.
    Author: Kozaci N, Ay MO, Akcimen M, Sasmaz I, Turhan G, Boz A.
    Journal: Am J Emerg Med; 2015 Oct; 33(10):1468-72. PubMed ID: 26175338.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: We aimed to compare the effectiveness of point-of-care ultrasonography (POCUS) with direct radiography (DR) in the diagnosis and management of the patients with metacarpal fractures (MFs). METHODS: Patients between ages 5 and 55 years admitted to the emergency department with suspected MFs were included to the study. Emergency physicians (EPs) participating in the study were divided into 2 groups (POCUS, DR). Patients were evaluated by one of the EPs from each group. The EP performing the POCUS examination was blinded to the radiograph results. RESULTS: A total of 66 patients with MFs were included to the study. Fracture was determined in 36 (55%) patients with DR and in 37 (56%) patients with POCUS. When compared with radiography, the sensitivity of fracture detection with POCUS was 92%; specificity, 87%; positive predictive value, 89%; and negative predictive value, 90% (95% confidence interval, 80%-98%). Sensitivity of detecting localization of the fracture with POCUS was 92%; specificity, 87%; positive predictive value, 89%; and negative predictive value, 89% (95% confidence interval, 80%-98%). Of the patients with fracture, 69% have angulation and 24% have step-off determined with POCUS. Specificity of POCUS in the decision for treatment choice was 100%, and sensitivity was 99%. CONCLUSION: We found that POCUS could be applied easily with success by EPs in diagnosing MFs, determining the type of the fracture and required treatment methods correctly. Point-of-care US can be used to rule out a suspected MF, thereby avoiding the time and expense of radiography.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]