These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: A prospective randomized comparison of fine needle aspiration biopsy and fibreoptic bronchoscopy in the investigation of peripheral pulmonary opacities.
    Author: Swinburn CR, Veale D, Peel ET, Wadehra V, Elliott ST, Sumerling MD, Corris PA, Gibson GJ.
    Journal: Respir Med; 1989 Nov; 83(6):493-5. PubMed ID: 2623218.
    Abstract:
    Twenty-nine patients, aged 66(+/- 7) years with a peripheral pulmonary opacity (mean diameter 3.6 +/- 1.8 cm) believed to be a tumor, were randomly allocated to initial investigation by either fibreoptic bronchoscopy or percutaneous fine needle aspiration biopsy, the latter performed under fluoroscopic control. The patients proceeded to the alternative investigation in the event of the first failing to achieve a diagnosis. Malignancy was confirmed by the initial procedure in 14/15 patients randomized to fine needle aspiration biopsy but only in 1/14 patients randomized to fibreoptic bronchoscopy (P less than 0.01). Overall, these figures were 25/28 fine needle aspiration biopsy and 2/15 fibreoptic bronchoscopy (P less than 0.01). These results confirm the clinical suspicion that fine needle aspiration biopsy is far more likely than fibreoptic bronchoscopy to establish the presence of malignancy in peripheral pulmonary opacities.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]