These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Sensitivity and Specificity of Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Diagnosis of Bladder Cancers.
    Author: Zhai N, Wang YH, Zhu LM, Wang JH, Sun XH, Hu XB, Li X, Yu T, Wang XL, Meng N, Yan QC, Li XJ, Luo YH.
    Journal: Clin Invest Med; 2015 Aug 09; 38(4):E173-84. PubMed ID: 26278427.
    Abstract:
    PURPOSE: Our study is designed to examine the diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) for bladder cancers (BC), and to determine whether DW-MRI can differentiate muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) from non-MIBC (NMIBC). METHODS: A meta-analysis was performed of published studies that investigated the performance of DW-MRI for BC. These studies were retrieved from scientific literature databases using sensitive electronic search strategies. The STATA 12.0 and Meta-disc software were employed for statistical analyses of data extracted from selected studies. RESULTS: Our search initially returned 230 articles, of which 11 met the inclusion criteria and were enrolled into the final meta-analysis. Five of the included studies reported the diagnostic performance of DW-MRI for BC with a cumulative total of 243 BC patients and 82 healthy subjects. Eight studies investigated the diagnostic performance of DW-MRI for differentiating MIBC from NMIBC, involving 259 MIBC lesions and 515 NMIBC lesions. Meta-analysis results were as follows: the diagnostic performance of DW-MRI for BC (sensitivity: 0.95 [0.75-0.99]; specificity: 0.85 [0.74-0.92]; positive likelihood ratio: 6.45 [3.64-11.42]; negative likelihood ratio: 0.055 [0.009-0.333]; diagnostic odds ratio: 117.11 [19.37-708.05]; area under the curve (AUC): 0.91); the diagnostic performance of DW-MRI to differentiate MIBC from NMIBC (sensitivity: 0.85 [0.76 - 0.91]; specificity: 0.90 [0.87 - 0.93]; positive likelihood ratio:8.81[6.43 - 12.07]; negative likelihood ratio: 0.16 [0.10 - 0.28]; diagnostic odds ratio: 53.95 [25.68 - 113.33]; AUC: 0.92). CONCLUSION: DW-MRI has an outstanding diagnostic performance, with advanced sensitivity and specificity, for imaging of bladder cancers and for differentiating MIBC from NMIBC.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]