These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Aspheric versus wavefront-guided photorefractive keratectomy: contralateral eye study. Author: Zarei-Ghanavati S, Gharaee H, Hamilton DR, Sanchez PJ, Abrishami M. Journal: J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Jul; 41(7):1441-7. PubMed ID: 26287882. Abstract: PURPOSE: To compare the refractive, visual, and aberrometric outcomes between wavefront-guided photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) and aspheric PRK in myopic patients. SETTING: Khatam-al-Anbia Eye Hospital, Mashhad, Iran. DESIGN: Prospective randomized clinical trial. METHODS: One eye of each patient was randomly assigned to excimer laser wavefront-guided PRK (Zyoptix) and the other eye to excimer laser aspheric PRK (Technolas 217z). The preoperative and 3-month and 6-month postoperative refractive errors, visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, and higher-order aberrations (HOAs) were compared between the groups. RESULTS: Ninety-six eyes (48 patients) were enrolled. At the last postoperative visit, there were no between-group differences in uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) (P = .987) or corrected distance visual acuity (P = .416). The mean spherical equivalent was -0.076 diopter (D) ± 0.029 (SD) in the wavefront-guided group and -0.077 ± 0.075 D in the aspheric PRK group (P = .684). Postoperatively, the mean area under the log of contrast sensitivity function (AULCSF) with and without glare testing improved over preoperative values (both P < .001). There was no statistically significant between-group difference in the AULCSF with glare (P = .903) or without glare (P = .978). Total HOAs increased after PRK in both groups, although aspheric PRK induced fewer HOAs than wavefront-guided PRK (P = .04). CONCLUSIONS: Both PRK methods equally improved postoperative UDVA and contrast sensitivity. The HOAs increased after treatment with both methods; however, aspheric ablation induced statistically fewer HOAs than wavefront-guided ablation. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]