These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Hydrodynamic Performance of the Medtronic CoreValve and the Edwards SAPIEN XT Transcatheter Heart Valve in Surgical Bioprostheses: An In Vitro Valve-in-Valve Model.
    Author: Sedaghat A, Sinning JM, Utzenrath M, Ghalati PF, Schmitz C, Werner N, Nickenig G, Grube E, Ensminger S, Steinseifer U, Kuetting M.
    Journal: Ann Thorac Surg; 2016 Jan; 101(1):118-24. PubMed ID: 26363653.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: Valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is becoming a valuable option with promising clinical results in failed bioprosthetic heart valves. Sizing recommendations are based on size compatibility rather than on broad clinical data, in vitro measurements, or biomechanical evidence. The hemodynamic performance of transcatheter heart valves within degenerated surgical heart valves is unknown. METHODS: We evaluated the in vitro hydrodynamic performance of two commercially available transcatheter heart valves (Medtronic CoreValve [Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN] and Edwards SAPIEN XT [Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA]) in two different bioprosthetic aortic valves (Edwards Perimount [Edwards Lifesciences] and St. Jude Trifecta [St. Jude Medical, St. Paul, MN]). RESULTS: Within the Edwards Perimount (23 mm) prosthesis, pressure gradients were higher for the SAPIEN XT compared with the CoreValve (11.2 ± 0.1 mm Hg versus 10.1 ± 0.1 mm Hg, p < 0.01), whereas effective orifice area (1.99 ± 0.01 cm(2) versus 1.80 ± 0.01 cm(2), p < 0.01) and total paravalvular leakage (9.0% ± 1.0% versus 5.4% ± 1.3%, p < 0.01) were increased when using the CoreValve. Similarly, measurements in the St. Jude Trifecta revealed higher transvalvular pressure gradients (13.0 ± 0.2 mm Hg versus 10.9 ± 0.3 mm Hg, p < 0.01) and lower effective orifice area for the SAPIEN XT compared with the CoreValve. However, total relative regurgitation was higher with SAPIEN XT as compared with the CoreValve in St. Jude Trifecta prostheses (11.2% ± 1.4% versus 8.3% ± 0.9%, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Both transcatheter heart valve prostheses performed well in the described valve-in-valve settings. Hydrodynamic results were in line with the International Organization for Standardization standards for all configurations. The observed differences indicate a necessity for preclinical valve-in-valve tests in addition to clinical long-term data about longevity.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]