These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Improving newborn hearing screening: Are automated auditory brainstem response ear inserts an effective option?
    Author: Chan KT, Wong EC, Law CW, Chong HM, McPherson B.
    Journal: Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Nov; 79(11):1920-5. PubMed ID: 26412459.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: Universal newborn hearing screening is an established practice among Hong Kong public hospitals using a 2-stage automated auditory brainstem response (AABR) screening protocol. To enhance overall efficiency without sacrificing program accuracy, cost reduction in terms of replacing the initial ear coupler-based screening with a more economical ear insert-based screening procedure was considered. This study examined the utility of an insert-based AABR initial screening approach and the projected cost-effectiveness of a combined probe-based plus follow-up ear coupler AABR screening procedure. METHODS: Following prenatal maternal consent, newborn hearing screening was conducted with 167 healthy neonates using a cross-sectional, repeated measures study design. The neonates were screened with AABR sequentially; using ear coupler and ear probe (insert) procedures, in both ears, with two different but comparable AABR instruments. Testing took place in the antenatal ward of a department of obstetrics and gynaecology, at a large public hospital. RESULTS: With the specific combination of instruments deployed for this study insert-based AABR screening generated a five-fold higher rescreen rate and took an additional 50% screening time compared to coupler-based AABR screening. Although the cost of consumables used in a 2-stage AABR screening protocol would reduce by 9.87% if the combined procedure was implemented, the findings indicated AABR screening when conducted with an ear probe has reduced utility compared with conventional ear coupler screening. CONCLUSIONS: Significant differences may occur in screening outcomes when changes are made to coupler method. Initiating a 2-stage AABR screening protocol with an ear insert technique may be impracticable in newborn nurseries given the greater number of false positive cases generated by this approach in the present study and the increased time required to carry out an insert-based procedure.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]