These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed


  • Title: Interrater Reliability in Analysis of Laryngoscopic Features for Unilateral Vocal Fold Paresis.
    Author: Isseroff TF, Parasher AK, Richards A, Sivak M, Woo P.
    Journal: J Voice; 2016 Nov; 30(6):736-740. PubMed ID: 26471809.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: The diagnosis of paresis in patients with vocal fold motion impairment remains a challenge. In particular, laryngoscopy examination may result in significant disagreement in diagnosis among providers. We hypothesize that systematically evaluating for a standard set of clinical parameters will increase the diagnostic concordance among providers. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective case series conducted at a Tertiary referral Laryngology office. METHODS: Two laryngologists (rater 1) and two trainees (rater 2) rated laryngoscopy findings in 19 patients suspected of paresis. The diagnosis was confirmed with laryngeal electromyogram. A standard set of 27 ratings was used for each examination that included movement, laryngeal configuration, and stroboscopy signs. A kappa coefficient was calculated for agreement in laryngoscopy findings and effectiveness in predicting the laterality of paresis. RESULTS: A substantial agreement (kappa coefficient > 0.61) existed between the raters for vocal fold length, vocal fold thickness, bowing, and reduction in movement. A moderate agreement (kappa coefficient > 0.41) existed between raters for piriform opening and reduced kinesis. The senior author was accurately able to diagnose the side of paresis in 89.5% of cases for a kappa coefficient of 0.78, whereas the trainees correctly predicted the side of paresis in 63.1% for a kappa coefficient of 0.35. The raters agreed on the diagnosis in 73.7% of cases for a kappa coefficient of 0.50. CONCLUSIONS: Using a standard set of laryngoscopy findings may improve the provider's ability to identify the laterality of vocal fold paresis and increase interrater reliability compared with other series.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]