These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [RESEARCH PROGRESS OF DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT OF HANGMAN FRACTURE].
    Author: Zhang B, Cai X, Ding R, Kang H.
    Journal: Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Apr; 29(4):513-7. PubMed ID: 26477169.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: To review the research progress of the diagnosis and treatment of Hangman fracture. METHODS: The original articles about the diagnosis and treatment of Hangman fracture were extensively reviewed and analyzed. RESULTS: Not only X-ray, but also MRI and CT scans are necessory for the diagnosis and assessment of Hangman fractures. The treatment of unstable Hangman fracture included posterior C2, C3 fixation, anterior C2, C3 fixation, and anterior C2, C3 fixation combined with posterior C2 pedicle screw fixation. The anterior surgical fixation is used by the anterior retropharyngeal approach or subaxial anterior approach, and it has the advantages of directly resecting the injured C2, C3 discs, getting a satisfactory cervical spine alignment, and avoiding the postoperative axial pain. However, posterior surgical fixation using C2 pedicle screw has the risks of neurovascular injuries. CONCLUSION: The surgical technique of Hangman fracture should be determined based on the patient's injury and surgeon's experience. Randomized control trials of different surgical techniques should be performed.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]