These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Image reconstruction of the flagellar basal body of Salmonella typhimurium.
    Author: Stallmeyer MJ, Aizawa S, Macnab RM, DeRosier DJ.
    Journal: J Mol Biol; 1989 Feb 05; 205(3):519-28. PubMed ID: 2648007.
    Abstract:
    The basal body is thought to be a part of the rotary motor of the bacterial flagellum. It consists of a central rod coaxial with a set of four rings, which are associated with the cell envelope. We used single-particle averaging methods to analyze images of negatively stained basal bodies of Salmonella typhimurium. Several averages were computed, so that the reliability of features could be assessed. We carried out the same analysis on electron micrographs of isolated, negatively stained L-P rings. In order to interpret the averages in terms of a three-dimensional structure, we carried out image reconstruction on them. The resulting three-dimensional map corresponds to the cylindrically averaged structure of the basal body. To show that the reconstruction procedure is legitimate, we demonstrate it on model data. The results of the modelling show that features very near to the axis of the reconstruction are not reliable but that broader, off-axis features are represented faithfully. The L ring is L-shaped, with the long arm of the L parallel to the axis of the rod, and the short arm pointing away from the rod. The P ring, on the other hand, appears to be a ring or disk. The position of the L-P ring complex on the rod seems to vary somewhat, consistent with its putative role as a bushing. The cross-sectional shape of the S ring is that of a frustum rather than a disk. The M ring, which is oval in cross section, sits atop the S ring, making contact with it at an outer radius. The S ring appears to make contact with the rod, whereas the M ring does not. This situation, if true, is difficult to reconcile with the common notion that the S ring is stationary and the M ring rotates. It seems more likely that the S ring and rod rotate as a unit.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]