These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Diagnostic value of the six-minute walk test (6MWT) in grown-up congenital heart disease (GUCH): Comparison with clinical status and functional exercise capacity. Author: Kehmeier ES, Sommer MH, Galonska A, Zeus T, Verde P, Kelm M. Journal: Int J Cardiol; 2016 Jan 15; 203():90-7. PubMed ID: 26498869. Abstract: BACKGROUND: Exercise testing for the assessment of functional capacity plays an important role in long-term follow-up of GUCH patients. CPX is the favored modality for decision-making recommended in the current guidelines. In contrast to this complex method, the 6 MWT is a simple, easy-to-perform, safe, and commonly available exercise test. Although well-established in various cardiopulmonary diseases, the diagnostic impact of the 6 MWT in GUCH patients is not known so far. METHODS: 102 GUCH patients were evaluated by 6 MWT and CPX simultaneously. Clinical symptoms were assessed, according to the NYHA classification. Additionally, an echocardiography study, and selected cardiac blood tests (N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), high-sensitive Troponin T) were performed. RESULTS: Ranges of six-minute walk distance (6 MWD) and peak oxygen consumption (peakVO2) were 116-765 m and 6.4-36.2 ml/kg/min, respectively. 6 MWD and peakVO2 showed a close correlation (r=0.72, 95% CI, 0.63 to 0.79). Patients with a peakVO2 of ≤ 15.5 ml/kg/min were excellently identified by 6 MWT (c-value=0.82). A cut-off value of 482 m was optimal to predict reduced peakVO2. In multivariate regression analysis, 6 MWD and NYHA class were identified as relevant predictors of peakVO2. In subgroup analysis, Eisenmenger patients achieved the shortest 6 MWD (280, SD 178 m). CONCLUSION: In our study population of GUCH patients, the 6 MWD shows a close correlation to peakVO2, and an excellent prediction of reduced peakVO2. Thus, it seems to be an easy-to-perform and reliable screening parameter to evaluate functional capacity of these patients (Controlled Clinical Trials number, NCT02193243).[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]