These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Long-term health economic benefits of sensor-augmented pump therapy vs continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion alone in type 1 diabetes: a U.K. perspective.
    Author: Roze S, Smith-Palmer J, Valentine WJ, Cook M, Jethwa M, de Portu S, Pickup JC.
    Journal: J Med Econ; 2016; 19(3):236-42. PubMed ID: 26510389.
    Abstract:
    AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) is an important treatment option for type 1 diabetes patients unable to achieve adequate glycemic control with multiple daily injections (MDI). Combining CSII with continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in sensor-augmented pump therapy (SAP) with a low glucose-suspend (LGS) feature may further improve glycemic control and reduce the frequency of hypoglycemia. A cost-effectiveness analysis of SAP + LGS vs. CSII plus self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) was performed to determine the health economic benefits of SAP + LGS in type 1 diabetes patients using CSII in the U.K. METHODS: Cost-effectiveness analysis was performed using the CORE diabetes model. Treatment effects were sourced from the literature, where SAP + LGS was associated with a projected HbA1c reduction of -1.49% vs. -0.62% for CSII, and a reduced frequency of severe hypoglycemia. The time horizon was that of patient lifetimes; future costs and clinical outcomes were discounted at 3.5% and 1.5% per annum, respectively. RESULTS: Projected outcomes showed that SAP + LGS was associated with higher mean quality-adjusted life expectancy (17.9 vs. 14.9 quality-adjusted life years [QALYs], SAP + LGS vs. CSII), and higher life expectancy (23.8 vs. 21.9 years), but higher mean lifetime direct costs (GBP 125,559 vs. GBP 88,991), leading to an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of GBP 12,233 per QALY gained for SAP + LGS vs. CSII. Findings of the base-case analysis remained robust in sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: For UK-based type 1 diabetes patients with poor glycemic control, the use of SAP + LGS is likely to be cost-effective compared with CSII plus SMBG.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]