These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: What is a "good" result after transcatheter mitral repair? Impact of 2+ residual mitral regurgitation.
    Author: Buzzatti N, De Bonis M, Denti P, Barili F, Schiavi D, Di Giannuario G, La Canna G, Alfieri O.
    Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2016 Jan; 151(1):88-96. PubMed ID: 26545970.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: The study objective was to assess the impact on follow-up outcomes of residual mitral regurgitation 2+ in comparison with ≤ 1+ after MitraClip (Abbott Vascular Inc, Santa Clara, Calif) repair. METHODS: We compared the outcomes of mitral regurgitation 2+ and mitral regurgitation ≤ 1 + groups among a population of 223 consecutive patients with acute residual mitral regurgitation ≤ 2+ who underwent MitraClip implantation at San Raffaele Scientific Institute (Milan, Italy) between October 2008 and December 2014. RESULTS: Residual mitral regurgitation 2+ was found in 64 patients (28.7%). Overall actuarial survival was 63.1% ± 4.4% at 48 months. Cumulative incidence functions of cardiac death in patients with mitral regurgitation 2+ was significantly higher (Gray test P < .001) compared with the mitral regurgitation ≤ 1+ group. The adjusted hazard ratio was 5.28 (95% confidence interval, 2.41-11.56, P < .001). Cumulative incidence function of mitral regurgitation ≥ 3+ recurrence in patients with residual mitral regurgitation ≤ 1+ and mitral regurgitation 2+ at 48 months was 13.3% ± 3.8% and 45.2% ± 6.8%, respectively (Gray test P < .001). Multivariate model showed that mitral regurgitation 2+ was the only factor associated with the development of mitral regurgitation ≥ 3+ at follow-up (adjusted hazard ratio, 6.71; 95% confidence interval, 3.48-12.90; P < .001). Mitral regurgitation cause was not associated with cardiac death and recurrence of mitral regurgitation ≥ 3+ at follow-up. No relationship between New York Heart Association class and follow-up time after MitraClip implant was found (odds ratio, 1.07; 95% confidence interval, 0.98-1.15; P = .11), and factors related to postoperative New York Heart Association also included residual mitral regurgitation 2+ (P = .07). CONCLUSIONS: Residual 2+ mitral regurgitation after MitraClip implantation was associated with worse follow-up outcomes compared with ≤ 1+ mitral regurgitation, including survival, symptom relief, and mitral regurgitation recurrence. Better efficacy should be pursued by transcatheter mitral repair technologies.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]