These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Accuracy of Hysteroscopic Endomyometrial Biopsy in Diagnosis of Adenomyosis.
    Author: Dakhly DM, Abdel Moety GA, Saber W, Gad Allah SH, Hashem AT, Abdel Salam LO.
    Journal: J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(3):364-71. PubMed ID: 26581187.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVES: To investigate the diagnostic accuracy of endomyometrial biopsy obtained via office hysteroscopy for the diagnosis of adenomyosis. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Cairo University Teaching Hospital, Cairo, Egypt. PATIENTS: A total of 404 premenopausal women with symptoms clinically suggestive of having adenomyosis. INTERVENTIONS: All patients were subjected to 2-dimensional transvaginal sonography (TVS) in-office hysteroscopy examination with endomyometrial biopsy. Patients who subsequently underwent hysterectomy were included in the final analysis. MAIN MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Accuracy of diagnostic modalities was represented using the terms sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and overall accuracy. A total of 292 patients were eligible for final analysis. Of these, 162 (55.47%) were diagnosed with adenomyosis based on hysterectomy specimens. TVS had a high sensitivity (83.95%) and a moderate specificity (60%). In contrast, endomyometrial biopsy was more specific (78.46%) than sensitive (54.32%). Hysteroscopic appearance of the endometrial cavity had low sensitivity (40.74%) and specificity (44.62%). Adding endomyometrial biopsy to TVS improved specificity (89.23%). CONCLUSION: Endomyometrial biopsy obtained via office hysteroscopy can diagnose adenomyosis with a high specificity and is recommended after TVS.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]