These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Should results of ultrasound Doppler studies be reported in units of frequency or velocity?
    Author: Phillips DJ, Beach KW, Primozich J, Strandness DE.
    Journal: Ultrasound Med Biol; 1989; 15(3):205-12. PubMed ID: 2662551.
    Abstract:
    There is a current tendency to report the results of ultrasound Doppler studies in units of velocity instead of Doppler frequency. This is probably motivated by the intuitive feeling that blood flow studies should naturally be reported in cm/s and the notion that "velocity" is a normalizing factor for Doppler ultrasound studies. In order to determine velocity, the Doppler angle theta or angle formed by the ultrasound beam and flow velocity vector, must be known. It is not possible, using currently available systems, to obtain an accurate estimate of this angle. The physics related to the Doppler equation are reviewed in this paper along with examples to illustrate the origin and magnitude of errors that could arise when reporting in units of velocity. Guidelines are provided for thinking about and reporting results of Doppler studies in units of velocity. An understanding of the Doppler equation and its use in clinical studies are promoted in this paper to enhance the diagnostic usefulness of Doppler ultrasound studies and to reduce serious errors which could lead to faulty information dictating patient management.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]