These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed


  • Title: Six-Fold Acceleration of High-Spatial Resolution 3D SPACE MRI of the Knee Through Incoherent k-Space Undersampling and Iterative Reconstruction-First Experience.
    Author: Fritz J, Raithel E, Thawait GK, Gilson W, Papp DF.
    Journal: Invest Radiol; 2016 Jun; 51(6):400-9. PubMed ID: 26685106.
    Abstract:
    PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to prospectively test the hypothesis that 6-fold acceleration of a 3-dimensional (3D) turbo spin echo (TSE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) pulse sequence with k-space undersampling and iterative reconstruction is feasible for fast high spatial resolution MRI of the knee, while yielding similar image quality and diagnostic performance when compared with a conventional 2-dimensional (2D) TSE MRI standard. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was approved by the institutional review board. A 10-minute isotropic 3D TSE knee protocol consisting of accelerated intermediate-weighted (repetition time, 900 milliseconds; echo time, 29 milliseconds; voxel size, 0.5 × 0.5 × 0.5 mm; acquisition time, 4:45 minutes) and fat-saturated T2-weighted (repetition time, 900 milliseconds; echo time, 92 milliseconds; voxel size, 0.5 × 0.5 × 0.5 mm; acquisition time, 5:10 minutes) SPACE (sampling perfection with application optimized contrast using different flip angle evolutions) sequence prototypes was compared against a 20-minute 2D TSE standard protocol. The accelerated SPACE sequences were equipped with an optional variable-density poisson-disc pattern as an undersampling mask. An undersampling factor of 0.17 was chosen (6-fold acceleration compared with an acquisition with full sampling). An iterative, sensitivity encoding-type reconstruction with L1 norm-based regularization term was used. The study was performed on a 3 T MRI system using a 15-channel transmit/receive knee coil. The study groups included 15 asymptomatic volunteers and 15 patient volunteers. Quantitative and qualitative assessments were performed by 2 observers. Outcome variables included signal and contrast-to-noise ratio, image quality, and diagnostic accuracy. Qualitative and quantitative measurements were statistically analyzed using nonparametric tests. P values of less than 0.01 were considered significant. RESULTS: The signal-to-noise ratios of 2D and 3D MRI were similar with the exception of fluid, which was brighter on 2D MRI. Relevant contrast-to-noise ratios of 2D MRI were higher than 3D MRI; however, observer ratings for satisfaction, image quality, and visibility of anatomic structures were similar for 2D and 3D MRI. There was moderate to excellent interobserver (κ = 0.54-1.00) and intermethod (κ = 0.54-1.00) agreement for assessing menisci, cartilage, ligaments, cartilage, and bone. Two-dimensional and 3D MRI had similar sensitivity (100%/100%, respectively) and specificity (87%/75%, respectively) for detecting 9 meniscal tears (P = 1.00). CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate the successful clinical implementation of 3D TSE MRI with incoherent k-space undersampling and iterative reconstruction for 6-fold accelerated high spatial resolution isotropic 3D MRI data acquisition. Our preliminary assessments suggest similar image quality and diagnostic performance of a comprehensive 10-minute 3D TSE MRI prototype protocol and 20-minute TSE MRI standard protocol.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]