These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Timing of Pulmonary Valve Replacement: How Much Can the Right Ventricle Dilate Before it Looses Its Remodeling Potential?
    Author: Alvarez-Fuente M, Garrido-Lestache E, Fernandez-Pineda L, Romera B, Sánchez I, Centella T, Abelleira C, Villagrá S, Tamariz R, Barrios E, Lamas MJ, Gomez R, Del Cerro MJ.
    Journal: Pediatr Cardiol; 2016 Mar; 37(3):601-5. PubMed ID: 26687177.
    Abstract:
    Congenital heart disease patients that develop secondary pulmonary regurgitation require a pulmonary valve replacement (PVR) in their follow-up. The indications for PVR in asymptomatic patients are debated. Most guidelines consider a RV end-diastolic volume (RVEDV) over 150 ml/m(2) as an indication for PVR. We analyzed clinical, echocardiographic and MRI variables of patients that underwent a surgical PVR between September 2006 and February 2013. The included patients were asymptomatic, without pulmonary stenosis and with both pre- and post-surgery MRI. Thirty-five patients (74.3 % males) were included. Mean age at PVR was 25.8 years (SD = 7.18), and weight was 64.5 Kg (SD = 12.03). The main diagnosis was tetralogy of Fallot (n = 28), pulmonary atresia (n = 2), primary pulmonary regurgitation (n = 2) and pulmonary regurgitation after percutaneous treatment (n = 2). The maximal RVEDV pre-PVR was 267 ml/m(2), and right ventricular end-systolic volume (RVESV) was 183 ml/m(2). RV size and function were established by MRI: Pre-PVR Post-PVR p RVEDV (ml/m(2)) 162 (SD = 39.1) 94 (SD = 23.6) <0.001 RVESV (ml/m(2)) 87 (SD = 28.9) 44 (SD = 15.7) <0.001 RVEF 44.8 % (SD = 8.17) 52 % (SD = 9.9) <0.001 Patients with a RVEDV under 170 ml/m(2) combined with a RVESV under 90 ml/m(2) had a favorable RV remodeling, defined as RVEDV under 110 ml/m(2) (sensitivity 87.5 %), RVESV under 55 ml/m(2) (sensitivity 100 %) and RVEF over 50 % (sensitivity 100 %). When deciding the optimal PVR timing in asymptomatic patients, both RVEDV and RVESV should be considered. Our results suggest that higher volumes than used in the clinical practice can achieve a good remodeling. Therefore, PVR could be performed later in the follow-up reducing the number of cardiac interventions.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]