These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Absence of airway inflammation in a large proportion of adolescents with asthma.
    Author: Brooks CR, van Dalen CJ, Zacharasiewicz A, Simpson JL, Harper JL, Le Gros G, Gibson PG, Pearce N, Douwes J.
    Journal: Respirology; 2016 Apr; 21(3):460-6. PubMed ID: 26693952.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Neutrophilic inflammation has been implicated in non-eosinophilic asthma (NEA) in adults, but little is known about NEA in children/adolescents. We assessed clinical and inflammatory characteristics of NEA in adolescent asthma. METHODS: Airway inflammation, sputum endotoxin, airway hyper-reactivity, atopy and lung function were assessed in 77 adolescents with asthma and 68 without asthma (12-17 years). Asthma was identified on the basis of wheeze and asthma history. RESULTS: The proportion of NEA (sputum eosinophils <2.5%) was 54%. In this group, atopy, sputum neutrophil, eosinophil, eosinophil cationic protein (ECP), endotoxin, neutrophil elastase and IL-8 levels were not different from those without asthma. In contrast, eosinophilic asthma (EA) was associated with atopy and sputum ECP and IL-8. The majority of NEA had no evidence of inflammation; only 14% had neutrophilia (≥61% neutrophils), compared with 11% of EA, and 15% of those without asthma. Small differences in FEV1 (NS) were found between EA and NEA, but symptom prevalence and severity was not different (63% of EA and 52% of NEA were classified moderate to severe). CONCLUSION: NEA is common in adolescent asthma and has similar clinical characteristics as EA. Neutrophils do not appear to play a role in NEA in adolescents, and underlying mechanisms may not involve airway inflammation.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]