These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Optimizing the MLC model parameters for IMRT in the RayStation treatment planning system.
    Author: Chen S, Yi BY, Yang X, Xu H, Prado KL, D'Souza WD.
    Journal: J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Sep 08; 16(5):322–332. PubMed ID: 26699315.
    Abstract:
    Unlike other commercial treatment planning systems (TPS) which model the rounded leaf end differently (such as the MLC dosimetric leaf gap (DLG) or rounded leaf-tip radius), the RayStation TPS (RaySearch Laboratories, Stockholm, Sweden) models transmission through the rounded leaf end of the MLC with a step function, in which the radiation transmission through the leaf end is the square root of the average MLC transmission factor. We report on the optimization of MLC model parameters for the RayStation planning system. This (TPS) models the rounded leaf end of the MLC with the following parameters: eaf-tip offset, leaf-tip width, average transmission factor, and tongue and groove. We optimized the MLC model parameters for IMRT in the RayStation v. 4.0 planning system and for a Varian C-series linac with a 120-leaf Millennium MLC, and validated the model using measured data. The leaf-tip offset is the geometric offset due to the rounded leaf-end design and resulting divergence of the light/radiation field. The offset value is a function of the leaf-tip position, and tabulated data are available from the vendor. The leaf-tip width was iteratively evaluated by comparing computed and measured transverse dose profiles of MLC defined fields at dmax in water. In-water profile comparisons were also used to verify the MLC leaf position (leaf-tip offset). The average transmission factor and leaf tongue-and-groove width were derived iteratively by maximizing the agreement between measurements and RayStation TPS calculations for five clinical IMRT QA plans. Plan verifications were performed by comparing MapCHECK2 measurements and Monte Carlo calculations. The MLC model was validated using five test IMRT cases from the AAPM Task Group 119 report. Absolute gamma analyses (3 mm/3% and 2 mm/2%) were applied. In addition, computed output factors for MLC-defined small fields (2 × 2, 3 × 3, 4 × 4, 6× 6cm2) of both 6 MV and 18 MV photons were compared to those independently measured by the Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core (IROC), Houston, TX. 6MV and 18 MV models were both determined to have the same MLC parameters: leaf-tip offset = 0.3 cm, 2.5% transmission, and leaf tongue-and-groove width = 0.05 cm. IMRT QA analysis for five test cases in TG-119 resulted in a 100% passing rate with 3 mm/3% gamma analysis for 6 MV, and > 97.5% for 18 MV. The passing rate was > 94.6% for 6 MV and > 90.9% for 18 MV when the 2 mm/2% gamma analysis criteria was applied. These results compared favorably with those published in AAPM Task Group 119. The reported MLC model parameters serve as a reference for other users.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]