These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Nonpalpable breast lesions: stereotaxic fine-needle aspiration cytology. Author: Ciatto S, Rosselli Del Turco M, Bravetti P. Journal: Radiology; 1989 Oct; 173(1):57-9. PubMed ID: 2675190. Abstract: The authors reviewed the accuracy of stereotaxic fine-needle aspiration cytology in prediction of the presence of cancer. Seventy-four nonpalpable breast cancers and 144 benign lesions were studied. The rate of obtaining an inadequate sample was 8.1% for cancers and 20.8% for benign lesions. None of the cytology reports were false-positive, whereas the accuracy of cytologic atypia in prediction of cancer was 72%. Sensitivity and specificity after 1 year of follow-up were 83.8% and 96.6%, respectively, with atypia reports being assumed positive. In patients strongly suspected of having cancer at mammography, the decision to perform biopsy must be independent of the cytologic report, as false-negative cytologic findings are expected. In patients with a low suspicion at mammography, abnormal cytologic findings were the determining factor for a request for biopsy of six cancers and of two benign lesions. Negative cytologic results contributed to the recommendation of follow-up of two lesions that turned out to be malignant. At the authors' institution, the benign-to-malignant biopsy ratio of nonpalpable lesions was greatly reduced after stereotaxic cytologic study became available; the rate of detection of subclinical cancer remained almost unaffected.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]