These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Readout-segmented echo-planar imaging in diffusion-weighted imaging of the kidney: comparison with single-shot echo-planar imaging in image quality. Author: Wu CJ, Wang Q, Zhang J, Wang XN, Liu XS, Zhang YD, Shi HB. Journal: Abdom Radiol (NY); 2016 Jan; 41(1):100-8. PubMed ID: 26830616. Abstract: OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the image quality of readout-segmented echo-planar imaging (RS-EPI) and that of standard single-shot echo-planar imaging (SS-EPI) in the kidney in a rat model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twelve Wistar rats undergoing MRI examinations were imaged with two diffusion-weighted (DW) imaging protocols: a standard SS-EPI and a new RS-EPI protocol, both with a 1.0 × 1.0 × 3.0 mm voxel. The two groups of diffusion-weighted images were independently scored on geometric distortion, image blurring, signal dropout, and the overall image quality by two radiologists. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) were measured on both sequences. Inter-rater agreement (IRA) was evaluated by Fleiss kappa (κ) and inter-class correlation coefficient (ICC) statistics. Comparisons of image qualities were made by Wilcoxon signed-rank test and paired-sample t test. RESULTS: Both RS-EPI and SS-EPI had good IRAs in scoring image qualities (κ = 0.607-0.833) and measuring renal ADCs (ICC = 0.828-0.945). Compared to SS-EPI, RS-EPI produced less geometric distortion (median score 1.5 versus 2.5, p < 0.0001), less image blurring (1.75 versus 2.0, p = 0.0003), less signal dropout (1.0 versus 3.0, p = 0.0001), and a lower score in overall image artifacts (4.25 versus 7.25; p < 0.0001). RS-EPI had higher SNR of renal DW images than SS-EPI (p < 0.001). The intra-variability of ADCs in cortex, outer medulla, and inner medulla ranged from 9.6% to 11.1% (Pearson correlation coefficient ρ = 0.675-0.729; p < 0.001) between the two protocols. CONCLUSION: We showed that for DWI of the kidney at 1.0 × 1.0 × 3.0 mm(3) voxel sizes, the new protocol provided better image quality than standard SS-EPI protocol.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]