These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Biomarkers for the identification of precursor polyps of colorectal serrated adenocarcinomas. Author: García-Solano J, García-Solano ME, Torres-Moreno D, Carbonell P, Trujillo-Santos J, Pérez-Guillermo M, Conesa-Zamora P. Journal: Cell Oncol (Dordr); 2016 Jun; 39(3):243-52. PubMed ID: 26832730. Abstract: BACKGROUND: In contrast to conventional colorectal carcinomas (CCs), which develop through a so-called chromosome instability or suppressor phenotype pathway, the sequence of events leading from precursor polyps/adenomas to serrated adenocarcinomas (SACs), which are more aggressive and exhibit a poorer survival than CCs, is as yet not clearly defined. Here, we aimed at detecting protein and DNA biomarkers for SAC in a series of primary colorectal polyps. METHODS: In total 303 colorectal polyps were included: 121 serrated polyps (33 hyperplastic polyps, 37 sessile serrated adenomas (SSA), 51 traditional serrated adenomas (TSA)), 143 conventional polyps (72 tubular polyps, 34 tubulovillous polyps, 37 villious adenomas), and 39 bi-phenotypic serrated-conventional polyps. The protein biomarkers tested were deduced from previously published SAC and CC expression profiling studies. A representative subset of 106 polyps was selected for DNA biomarker analyses, i.e., proto-oncogene mutation and microsatellite instability (MSI) status. In order to confer proper weight to each biomarker, a multivariate logistic regression model was employed. RESULTS: We found that serrated and conventional polyps differed in most of the SAC biomarkers tested. Of these biomarkers, FSCN1 showed the largest difference in expression (p = 0.0001). Despite sharing a serrated morphology, we found that SSAs and TSAs differed considerably with respect to anatomical location, expression of EPHB2 and PTCH1, presence of the V600E BRAF mutation and MSI status. Logistic regression analysis revealed that SSA was the polyp type that shared most biomarkers with SAC. CONCLUSION: Based on the shared presence of protein and molecular biomarkers, especially FSCN1 expression, SSA may serve as a precursor lesion of SAC. Biomarker assessment may help in discerning colorectal carcinogenic routes with distinct prognostic implications.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]