These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Does early post-operative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (EPIC) for patients treated with cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) make a difference?
    Author: Tan GH, Ong WS, Chia CS, Tham CK, Soo KC, Teo MC.
    Journal: Int J Hyperthermia; 2016 May; 32(3):281-8. PubMed ID: 26862667.
    Abstract:
    INTRODUCTION: Peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) is increasingly being treated with cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), with or without early post-operative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (EPIC). We compared the morbidities, overall survival (OS) and disease free survival (DFS) between two groups of patients who underwent CRS and HIPEC alone and with EPIC at our institution. METHODS: A retrospective review of 111 patients with PC who were treated with CRS + HIPEC or CRS + HIPEC + EPIC in a single institution between January 2008 and April 2014 was performed. EPIC with 5-fluorouracil or paclitaxel was utilised, depending on the primary tumour. RESULTS: Patients who received EPIC had a higher proportion of grade III and above post- operative complications (58% versus 25%; p = 0.048) and a longer duration of hospitalisation (16 days versus 13 days; p = 0.019) than patients without EPIC. There were no significant OS and DFS differences between the EPIC and no EPIC groups (log-rank p = 0.231 and p = 0.144, respectively). CONCLUSION: The use of EPIC after CRS + HIPEC for PC potentially results in increased morbidity and longer hospitalisation, and is unlikely to affect survival outcomes. Based on our experience, EPIC is not recommended after CRS and HIPEC.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]