These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Enhancement Threshold of Small (< 4 cm) Solid Renal Masses on CT.
    Author: Al Harbi F, Tabatabaeefar L, Jewett MA, Finelli A, O'Malley M, Atri M.
    Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Mar; 206(3):554-8. PubMed ID: 26901011.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to determine whether small (< 4 cm) solid renal cell carcinomas (RCCs) enhance on CT below the published enhancement thresholds. MATERIALS AND METHODS: For this retrospective study, we reviewed CT examinations of patients with pathologically characterized small solid renal masses. Patients with lipid-rich angiomyolipomas were excluded. The study included consecutive patients who had pathologically characterized small (< 4 cm) renal masses and had undergone CT during the un-enhanced phase and nephrographic phase (NP). Most CT examinations also included imaging during the corticomedullary phase (CMP); four patients did not have CMP images. The CT examinations were performed on a 64-MDCT scanner. Similar-sized ROIs were placed on each lesion on unenhanced and enhanced images and enhancement (in Hounsfield units) was calculated. Masses were considered solid with a threshold enhancement greater than either 15 or 20 HU. RESULTS: There were 137 masses in 137 patients, 90 men and 47 women (age range, 21-91 years; median age, 65 years). The renal masses were 1.0-3.9 cm (median, 2.4 cm). Of the 137 masses, 117 (85.4%) were malignant and 20 (14.6%) were benign. One malignant mass and three benign masses did not have CMP images. Twenty of the 116 (17.2%) renal cell carcinomas (RCCs) did not reach the 15-HU threshold enhancement on CMP images, nine of 117 masses (7.7%) did not reach the 15-HU enhancement threshold on NP images, and four of 117 masses (3.4%) did not reach the 15-HU enhancement threshold on both CMP and NP images. The numbers of masses that did not reach the 20-HU enhancement threshold were 24 of 116 masses (20.7%) on CMP images, 14 of 117 masses (11.9%) on NP images, and 11 of 117 masses (9.4%) on both CMP and NP images. Depending on the phase or enhancement threshold, 13.6-59.1% of papillary RCCs did not reach the enhancement threshold. CONCLUSION: A minority of small RCCs do not reach either a 15- or 20-HU enhancement threshold and might be misinterpreted as a hyperattenuating cyst. Most RCCs below these enhancement thresholds are papillary RCC.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]