These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Comparison of new and conventional versions of model-based iterative reconstruction in reduced-dose computed tomography for diagnosis of hepatic steatosis.
    Author: Yasaka K, Katsura M, Sato J, Akahane M, Matsuda I, Ohtomo K.
    Journal: Jpn J Radiol; 2016 May; 34(5):339-48. PubMed ID: 26906520.
    Abstract:
    PURPOSE: To compare new and conventional versions of model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR) in reduced-dose computed tomography (CT) in terms of diagnostic performance for hepatic steatosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Images were reconstructed from standard-dose and aggressively reduced-dose (the dose-length product was reduced by 91 %) unenhanced abdominopelvic CT scans of 86 patients using filtered back projection (SD-FBP) and new and conventional versions of MBIR (RD-MBIRn and RD-MBIRc), respectively. The mean CT attenuation of the liver (CT[L]) and the spleen as well as the ratio of these parameters (CT[L/S]) were calculated. CT[L] <48 Hounsfield units (HU) and CT[L/S] <1.1 were applied to SD-FBP (used as the reference standard; the number of positive patients was 12 and 14, respectively), RD-MBIRn, and RD-MBIRc. RESULTS: CT[L]s in SD-FBP/RD-MBIRn/RD-MBIRc were 56.9/55.9/52.8 HU. The difference in CT[L] between RD-MBIRn and SD-FBP was within ±5.0 HU in most cases. The sensitivity/specificity/accuracy of CT[L] <48 HU in RD-MBIRn and RD-MBIRc were 1.00/0.97/0.98 and 1.00/0.92/0.93, respectively, showing that RD-MBIRn permits significant improvements in specificity and accuracy (P < 0.05, McNemar test). For CT[L/S] <1.1, these values were 0.79/0.97/0.94 and 0.79/0.97/0.94 in RD-MBIRn and RD-MBIRc, respectively. CONCLUSION: When CT[L] <48 HU was applied, RD-MBIRn presented a significantly improved hepatic steatosis diagnostic performance compared with RD-MBIRc; indeed, it was almost equivalent to that afforded by SD-FBP.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]