These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Enteral feeding during indomethacin treatment for patent ductus arteriosus: association with gastrointestinal outcomes.
    Author: Louis D, Torgalkar R, Shah J, Shah PS, Jain A.
    Journal: J Perinatol; 2016 Jul; 36(7):544-8. PubMed ID: 26914015.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: Enteral feeds are often discontinued or reduced during indomethacin treatment for patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) in preterm neonates, but the clinical impact of this practice is unknown. The objective of this study was to study the associations between enteral feed volume at the time of indomethacin therapy in preterm neonates with PDA and subsequent gastrointestinal outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. Single-center level III Neonatal Intensive Care Unit. RESULTS: All consecutive preterm neonates who had received treatment with indomethacin for PDA over a 5-year period were included and categorized based on enteral feed volume exposure during treatment (Group A: nil per oral (NPO, N=229); Group B: ⩽60 ml kg(-1) day(-1) (N=142); Group C:>60 ml kg(-1) day(-1) (N=44)). Baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes were compared between the three groups. The primary outcome was necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) ⩾stage IIa, while secondary outcomes included other gastrointestinal complications and common prematurity-related morbidities. Group C had a higher gestational age (mean±s.d.; A: 26.3±1.8; B: 26.1±1.8; C: 27.0±2.0 weeks), birth weight (A: 864±239; B: 847±202; C: 932±234 g) and postnatal age at the time of indomethacin treatment (A: 5.3±2.9; B: 7.2±4.9; C: 15.4±6.6 days). All groups had similar rates of the primary outcome NEC (A: 6.1%, B: 7.8% and C: 4.6%, respectively). They also had similar rates of the secondary outcomes with the exception of days to reach enteral feeds of 120 ml kg(-1) day(-1) (A: 22.8±8.5; B: 20.5±8.6; C: 16.8±7.7; P<0.05 for all inter-group comparisons). Secondary analysis including only those neonates who were not already NPO before indomethacin treatment (N=261) and categorized based on preemptive management (made NPO; enteral feed volume reduced; enteral feed volume unchanged/increased) also showed similar results. CONCLUSIONS: This large retrospective study did not identify any association between enteral feed volumes during indomethacin treatment or preemptive reduction in enteral feeds and subsequent incidence of adverse gastrointestinal outcomes in preterm neonates. Preemptive reduction in enteral feed volume was associated with longer time to reach full enteral feeds.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]