MEDLINE/PubMed Journal Browser Search

Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

Title: Equivalency challenge: Evaluation of Lipodox® as the generic equivalent for Doxil® in a human ovarian cancer orthotropic mouse model.
Author: Smith JA, Mathew L, Burney M, Nyshadham P, Coleman RL.
Journal: Gynecol Oncol; 2016 May; 141(2):357-363. PubMed ID: 26946092.
Abstract:
BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to evaluate the in vivo growth inhibition activity and tumor distribution of Doxil® compared to Lipodox® as its generic (GLD) in human ovarian cancer orthotopic mouse model. METHODS: In the efficacy study 50 mice were randomized to: vehicle, Doxil® 5mg/kg or 10mg/kg, or GLD 5mg/kg or 10mg/kg for a total of three cycles with monitoring for response and toxicity with 10 mice in each arm. In the microdialysis(MD) study, 60 mice were randomized to: Doxil® 5mg/kg or 10mg/kg, or GLD 5mg/kg or 10mg/kg single dose (n=15 mice/arm). MD sample time points included total of 29 samples from baseline through 100h and were evaluated with a validated PaperSpray LC/MS assay. RESULTS: There was 15.7% decrease (p<0.0001) in efficacy of GLD the 5mg/kg and 21.3% decrease (p<0.0001) in efficacy of the 10mg/kg dose of GLD when compared to equivalent doses of Doxil®. The intratumoral concentration for the GLD ranged from 1.0 to 25.5ng/mL (5mg/kg) and 2.9-35.6ng/mL (10mg/kg) compared to 2.7-42.2ng/mL (p<0.04, 5mg/kg) and 2.0-76ng/mL (p<0.02, 10mg/kg) for the Doxil®, respectively. CONCLUSION: Significant differences in preclinical efficacy were observed between Doxil® and GLD. These may be due to significant pharmacodynamic effects of drug distribution and decrease uptake of GLD in tumor tissue. A prospective clinical comparison of these two products is warranted to determine equivalency.

[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]