These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Self-centering split-tip catheter versus conventional split-tip catheter in prevalent hemodialysis patients.
    Author: Balamuthusamy S, Nguyen P, Bireddy S, Vallurapalli A, Jalandhara N, Afolabi D.
    Journal: J Vasc Access; 2016 May 07; 17(3):233-8. PubMed ID: 26980629.
    Abstract:
    PURPOSE: This study compared the patency of a split-tip self-centering catheter with a predesigned curve (CentrosFLO; Merit, Salt Lake City, Utah) and a standard split-tip catheter with straight distal limbs (Medcomp, Harleysville, Pennsylvania) catheter in patients requiring exchange of a dysfunctional tunneled dialysis catheter (TDC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A single-center retrospective chart review was performed between January 2013 and July 2014. Patients had an existing dysfunctional TDC that was exchanged over a wire using the same access site for either a split-tip self-centering catheter with a predesigned curve or a standard split-tip catheter with straight distal limbs catheter. The primary endpoint was catheter patency analyzed at 1, 3, and 6 months after initial exchange. RESULTS: A total of 73 patients met inclusion criteria (46 in the self-centering catheter group and 27 in the standard split-tipped group). Mean durations of the exchanged catheters were similar between groups. The mean 1-, 3-, and 6-month patency rates for the self-centering and split-tip catheters were 89%, 67.4%, and 23.9% and 81.5%, 40.7%, and 14.8%, respectively. Mean blood flow rates (BFRs) were similar between groups at 1 and 3 months; however, at 6 months, mean rates were 388 mL/min versus 352 mL/min for the self-centering group and split-tipped group, respectively (p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate improved patency with the CentrosFLO self-centering catheter versus the split-tip catheter. This may be due to the unique design of the self-centering catheter, allowing for preserved BFRs and patency. These results should be further explored in prospective, randomized multicenter studies.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]