These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: [IN VIVO THREE-DIMENSIONAL TRANSIENT MOTION CHARACTERISTICS OF THE SUBAXIAL CERVICAL SPINE IN HEALTHY ADULTS]. Author: Li H, Xia Q, Bai J, Miao J, Liu J, Wei D. Journal: Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Dec; 29(12):1494-9. PubMed ID: 27044217. Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To observe the in vivo three-dimensional (3-D) transient motion characteristics of the subaxial cervical spine in healthy adults. METHODS: Seventeen healthy volunteers without cervical spine related diseases were recruited for this study, including 8 males and 9 females with a mean age of 26 years (range, 23-41 years). The vertebral segment motion of each subject was reconstructed with CT, and Rhinoceros 4.0 solid modeling software were used for 3-D reconstruction model of the subaxial cervical spine. In vivo cervical vertebral motion in flexion-extension, left and right bending, left and right rotation was observed with dual fluoroscopic imaging system (DFIS). Coordinate systems were established at the vertebral center of C₃-₇ to obtain the intervertebral range of motion (ROM) and displacement at C₃,₄, C₄,₅, C₅,₆, and C₆,₇. The X-axis pointed to the left along the coronal plane, the Y-axis pointed to the back along the sagittal plane, and the Z-axis perpendicular to the X-Y plane pointed to the head. The ROM along X, Y, and Z axises were represented by rotation in flexion-extension (α), in left-right bending (β), and in left-right twisting (y) respectively, and the displacement in left-right direction (x), in anterior-posterior direction (y), and in proximal-distal direction (z), respectively. RESULTS: In flexion and extension, the displacement in anterior-posterior direction of C₆,₇ was significantly less that of other segments (P < 0.05), but the displacements in left-right direction and in proximal- distal direction showed no significant difference between segments (P > 0.05); the ROM values in flexion-extension of C₄,₅ and C₅,₆ were significantly larger than those of C₃,₄ and C₆,₇ (P < 0.05), and the ROM value in left-right twisting of C₄,₅ was significantly larger than those of C₅,₆ and C₆,₇ (P < 0.05), but the ROM value in left-right bending showed no significant difference between segments (P > 0.05). In left and right bending, there was no significant difference in the displacement between other segments (P > 0.05) except that the displacement in anterior-posterior direction of C₃,₄ was significantly larger than that of C₄,₅ (P< 0.05), and that the displacement in proximal-distal direction of C₆,₇ was significantly less than that of C₃,₄ and C₄,₅ (P < 0.05); no significant difference was shown in the ROM value between segments (P > 0.05), except that the ROM value in left-right twisting of C₃,₄ was significantly larger than that of C₅,₆ and C₆,₇ (P < 0.05). In left and right rotation, the ROM value in left-right twisting of C₃,₄ was significantly larger than that of C₄,₅ and C₆,₇ (P < 0.05), and the displacement and ROM value showed no significant differece between other segments (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: The intervertebral motions of the cervical spine show different characters at different levels. And the 6-degree-of-freedom data of the cervical vertebrae are obtained, these data may provide new information for the in vivo kinematics of the cervical spine.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]