These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Readmissions Following Implantation of a Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device.
    Author: Da Silva M, MacIver J, Rodger M, Jaffer M, Raju S, Billia F, Rao V.
    Journal: J Card Surg; 2016 May; 31(5):361-4. PubMed ID: 27072942.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to review and analyze readmission data for patients who received a continuous flow left ventricular assist device (LVAD). METHODS: A retrospective review of 88 patients implanted with a continuous-flow LVAD between June 2006 and June 2014 was performed. Reason for readmission, frequency, length of stay, and procedures performed during each readmission were recorded. All patients were followed in our LVAD clinic and all readmissions were reported to our program. RESULTS: Sixty-seven patients (76%) were discharged following their hospitalization for LVAD implant. In these patients, indication for LVAD support consisted of bridge to transplant (78%) and destination therapy (22%). Total device support time was 30,482 days, with an average support time of 455 ± 376 days. Forty-two patients (63%) were readmitted at least once, with an average length of readmission stay of nine days (median = 6). There were 129 readmissions totaling 1264 hospital days. The main reason for readmission was infection (17%). Despite this relatively high readmission rate, patients spent 86% of their time outside the hospital. CONCLUSION: Although common, LVAD readmissions can be appropriately managed with patients spending the majority of their support time at home. doi: 10.1111/jocs.12744 (J Card Surg 2016;31:361-364).
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]