These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Prediction of tumor response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer using (18)fluorine-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography and serum carcinoembryonic antigen: a prospective study.
    Author: Li QW, Zheng RL, Ling YH, Wang QX, Xiao WW, Zeng ZF, Fan W, Li LR, Gao YH.
    Journal: Abdom Radiol (NY); 2016 Aug; 41(8):1448-55. PubMed ID: 27116012.
    Abstract:
    PURPOSE: To investigate the association between (18)fluorine-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography ((18)F-FDG PET/CT) parameters, serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), and tumor response in patients with rectal cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT). METHODS: Sixty-four patients with T3-4 and/or node-positive rectal cancer receiving nCRT followed by surgery were prospectively studied. PET/CT was performed before, and in 28 patients, both before and after nCRT. The pre-/post-nCRT maximum standardized uptake (SUVmax) values, differences between pre-/post-nCRT SUVmax (∆SUVmax), response index of SUVmax (RI-SUVmax), mean standardized uptake value (SUVmean), metabolic tumor volume (MTV), total lesion glycolysis (TLG), and CEA were measured. The ability of PET/CT parameters and CEA to predict Mandard's tumor regression grade (TRG) and pathological complete remission (pCR) were evaluated. RESULTS: 31 patients were identified as responders (TRG 1-2), and 19 exhibited pCR. For responders, significant differences were found for ΔSUVmax (24.88 vs. 15.39 g/ml, p = 0.037), RI-SUVmax (0.76 vs. 0.63, p = 0.025), ΔSUVmean (14.43 vs. 8.65 g/ml, p = 0.029), RI-SUVmean (0.77 vs. 0.63, p = 0.011), CEA-pre (6.30 vs. 27.86 μg/L, p < 0.001), CEA-post (2.22 vs. 5.49 μg/L, p = 0.002), ΔCEA (4.08 vs. 23.13 μg/L, p < 0.001), and RI-CEA (0.25 vs. 0.55, p = 0.002). Differences between pCR and non-pCR patients were noted as RI-SUVmean (0.77 vs. 0.65, p = 0.043), MTV-pre (9.87 vs. 14.62 cm(3), p = 0.045), CEA-pre (5.62 vs. 22.27 μg/L, p = 0.002), CEA-post (1.95 vs. 4.72 μg/L, p = 0.001), and ΔCEA (3.68 vs. 17.99 μg/L, p = 0.013). Receiver operating characteristic analysis revealed that RI-SUVmean exhibited the greatest accuracy in predicting responders, whereas CEA-post and ΔCEA exhibited the greatest accuracy in predicting pCR. CONCLUSIONS: (18)F-FDG PET/CT parameters and CEA are accurate tools for predicting tumor response to nCRT in rectal cancer.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]