These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: A multicenter study of viable PCR using propidium monoazide to detect Legionella in water samples.
    Author: Scaturro M, Fontana S, Dell'eva I, Helfer F, Marchio M, Stefanetti MV, Cavallaro M, Miglietta M, Montagna MT, De Giglio O, Cuna T, Chetti L, Sabattini MAB, Carlotti M, Viggiani M, Stenico A, Romanin E, Bonanni E, Ottaviano C, Franzin L, Avanzini C, Demarie V, Corbella M, Cambieri P, Marone P, Rota MC, Bella A, Ricci ML.
    Journal: Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2016 Jul; 85(3):283-288. PubMed ID: 27133308.
    Abstract:
    Legionella quantification in environmental samples is overestimated by qPCR. Combination with a viable dye, such as Propidium monoazide (PMA), could make qPCR (named then vPCR) very reliable. In this multicentre study 717 artificial water samples, spiked with fixed concentrations of Legionella and interfering bacterial flora, were analysed by qPCR, vPCR and culture and data were compared by statistical analysis. A heat-treatment at 55 °C for 10 minutes was also performed to obtain viable and not-viable bacteria. When data of vPCR were compared with those of culture and qPCR, statistical analysis showed significant differences (P < 0.001). However, although the heat-treatment caused an abatement of CFU/mL ≤1 to 1 log10 unit, the comparison between untreated and heat-treated samples analysed by vPCR highlighted non-significant differences (P > 0.05). Overall this study provided a good experimental reproducibility of vPCR but also highlighted limits of PMA in the discriminating capability of dead and live bacteria, making vPCR not completely reliable.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]