These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Retinal arteriolar remodeling evaluated with adaptive optics camera: Relationship with blood pressure levels.
    Author: Gallo A, Mattina A, Rosenbaum D, Koch E, Paques M, Girerd X.
    Journal: Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris); 2016 Jun; 65(3):203-7. PubMed ID: 27184511.
    Abstract:
    AIM: To research a retinal arterioles wall-to-lumen ratio or lumen diameter cut-off that would discriminate hypertensive from normal subjects using adaptive optics camera. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One thousand and five hundred subjects were consecutively recruited and Adaptive Optics Camera rtx1™ (Imagine-Eyes, Orsay, France) was used to measure wall thickness, internal diameter, to calculate wall-to-lumen ratio (WLR) and wall cross-sectional area of retinal arterioles. Sitting office blood pressure was measured once, just before retinal measurements and office blood pressure was defined as systolic blood pressure>=140mmHg and diastolic blood pressure>=90mmHg. ROC curves were constructed to determine cut-off values for retinal parameters to diagnose office hypertension. In another population of 276 subjects office BP, retinal arterioles evaluation and home blood pressure monitoring were obtained. The applicability of retinal WLR or diameter cut-off values were compared in patients with controlled, masked, white-coat and sustained hypertension. RESULTS: In 1500 patients, a WLR>0.31 discriminated office hypertensive subjects with a 0.57 sensitivity and 0.71 specificity. Lumen diameter<78.2μm discriminated office hypertension with a 0.73 sensitivity and a 0.52 specificity. In the other 276 patients, WLR was higher in sustained hypertension vs normotensive patients (0.330±0.06 vs 0.292±0.05; P<0.001) and diameter was narrower in masked hypertensive vs normotensive subjects (73.0±11.2 vs 78.5±11.6μm; P<0.005). CONCLUSION: A WLR higher than 0.31 is in favour of office arterial hypertension; a diameter under<78μm may indicate a masked hypertension. Retinal arterioles analysis through adaptive optics camera may help the diagnosis of arterial hypertension, in particular in case of masked hypertension.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]