These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Diagnosis of sessile serrated adenomas/polyps with image-enhanced endoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Author: Parikh ND, Chaptini L, Njei B, Laine L.
    Journal: Endoscopy; 2016 Aug; 48(8):731-9. PubMed ID: 27223636.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Distinguishing sessile serrated adenomas/polyps (SSA/Ps) from non-neoplastic tissue may be challenging when white-light endoscopy (WLE) is used. Image-enhanced endoscopy (IEE) has shown accuracy in differentiating adenomas from hyperplastic polyps. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the utility of IEE in diagnosis of SSA/Ps. METHODS: Studies were eligible if: they included patients undergoing colonoscopy with an endoscopy-based image-enhancement modality; endoscopic diagnoses, including SSA/P, were based on the appearance of polyps at IEE; and the corresponding histologic diagnoses of polyps were provided. The primary outcome was sensitivity of IEE for SSA/Ps differentiated from non-neoplastic lesions (primary convention) and differentiated from all non-SSA/P lesions, including adenomas (secondary convention). RESULTS: 13 studies met inclusion criteria. Sensitivity ranged from 38 % to 100 % but sensitivity ≥ 90 % was seen in 4 of 10 narrow band imaging (NBI) or magnification-NBI studies. Pooled sensitivities for discriminating SSA/Ps from non-neoplastic lesions were 80 % for magnification-NBI, 60 % for NBI, 49 % for autofluorescence, and 47 % for flexible spectral imaging color enhancement. In head-to-head comparisons with WLE, NBI (89 % vs. 75 %) and magnification-NBI (78 % vs. 63 %) demonstrated significantly greater sensitivity, while autofluorescence imaging (56 % vs. 66 %), flexible spectral imaging color enhancement (100 % vs. 100 %), and high-resolution endomicroscopy (88 % vs. 100 %) did not. CONCLUSION: IEE currently cannot be recommended as a diagnostic tool for SSA/P. While NBI studies showed promise, more IEE studies employing validated SSA/P criteria in well-defined polyp populations are needed. IEE studies assessing SSA/P detection rates at colonoscopy are also needed.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]