These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Kinematic analysis of cervical spine canal diameter and its association with grade of degeneration.
    Author: Jiang X, Chen D, Lou Y, Li Z.
    Journal: Eur Spine J; 2016 Jul; 25(7):2166-72. PubMed ID: 27236657.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVES: To investigate the cervical spinal canal diameters variance under positional MRI, and also the relationship between cervical canal diameter variance rate and grade of degeneration. METHODS: From January 2013 to January 2015, a consecutive of 273 symptomatic patients (166 males and 207 females) with an average age of 44.6 years (range 21-89 years) underwent positional cervical MRI. T2-weighted sagittal images of 1638 cervical intervertebral discs from 273 subjects were classified into five grades. The canal diameter and canal diameter variance rate at three positions and their comparison among five grade of degeneration were evaluated. The measurements were tabulated and analyzed using SPSS. 13.0. p values less than 0.05 were considered to indicate a statistically significant difference. RESULTS: The sagittal cervical canal diameter at the C5/6 level were the smallest compared with the other levels regardless of neutral, flexion or extension positions, C5/6 level had the largest canal diameter variance rate in both flexion and extension (8.14 ∓ 0.38 and 7.81 ∓ 0.31 %, respectively), second was C4/5 level (7.65 ∓ 0.39 and 7.67 ∓ 0.32 %, respectively). A total of 1638 discs were classified into 5 groups, each level showed the similar tendency that no matter what position, with the increasing grade of degenerative disc degree, spine canal diameter decreased gradually. For C5/6 under extension and flexion position, significant difference was also noted between grade 2 and 3; For C4/5 under extension position, significant difference existed between grade 1 and 2, grade 1 and 3, while under flexion position, significant difference existed between grade 2 and 4, and the results also showed no significant difference at the same degree of degeneration on both levels between extension and flexion position. CONCLUSIONS: C5/6 and C4/5 is of higher risk of suffering SCI than other levels, C4/5 level predispose SCI at earlier stage than C5/6, patients presenting with intermediate signal and slight decreased disc height on T2 weighted MRI at C4/5 level should be paid attention.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]