These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed


  • Title: Prescribing Aerobic Exercise Intensity without a Cardiopulmonary Exercise Test Post Stroke: Utility of the Six-Minute Walk Test.
    Author: Marzolini S, Oh P, Corbett D, Dooks D, Calouro M, MacIntosh BJ, Goodman R, Brooks D.
    Journal: J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis; 2016 Sep; 25(9):2222-31. PubMed ID: 27289183.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: The cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) is an established method for determining target exercise training intensity (ventilatory threshold [VAT]) and cardiovascular risk; unfortunately, CPET is not readily accessible to people post stroke. The objective of this study was to determine the utility of the 6-minute walk test (6MWT) as a less resource-intensive alternative to CPET for prescribing exercise intensity to people post stroke with motor impairments. METHODS: Sixty participants (male, 71.7%; 13.5 ± 22.5 [mean ± standard deviation] months post stroke; age 64.5 ± 12.5 years, with a Chedoke-McMaster Stroke Assessment score of 4.9 ± .9 of the leg) underwent 6MWT, CPET, balance, strength, and cognition assessments. RESULTS: 6MWT heart rate (hr) was significantly lower than VAT-hr (92.3 ± 14.8 beats⋅min(-1) versus 99.8 ± 15.7 beats⋅min(-1), respectively, P < .001; correlation r = .7, P < .001). Bland-Altman analysis revealed that the 6MWT underestimated the VAT-hr by 7.7 ± 11.5%. The 95% confidence interval of the mean bias was large (14.8% and -30.3%), reflecting poor agreement, with 71.7% (n = 43) of the participants unable to reach a walking intensity at or above the VAT-hr. Lower oxygen uptake at the VAT (β = .655, P = .004), higher 6MWT-hr (β = 1.07, P = .01), and better balance (β = 1.128, P = .04) were associated with greater utility of the 6MWT for prescribing exercise. CONCLUSIONS: The 6MWT-hr was not interchangeable with the target training VAT-hr determined by CPET. However, in combination with CPET, the 6MWT will indicate when deficits preclude walking alone as the primary exercise modality for optimizing cardiovascular fitness. Future studies to develop a less resource-intensive, multimodal alternative to the CPET for prescribing exercise are needed. A modality that minimizes the effect of stroke deficits, specifically poor balance, should be included.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]