These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Use of Perforator-Based Fasciocutaneous Flaps for Pressure Sore Reconstruction: Single-Perforator-Based Versus Multiple-Perforator-Based Flaps.
    Author: Chih-Hsun L, Ma H.
    Journal: Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2016 Aug; 40(4):540-8. PubMed ID: 27302416.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: A perforator-based fasciocutaneous flap is an alternative type of flap for pressure sore reconstruction. The aim of the present study was to determine whether a single-perforator-based flap or a multiple-perforator-based flap is better for pressure sore reconstruction. METHODS: We reviewed the general data and postoperative complications in patients who received single-perforator-based or multiple-perforator-based fasciocutaneous flaps for pressure sore reconstruction between July 2009 and July 2012. RESULTS: No differences in general data, comorbidities, wound locations, flap sizes (73.9 vs. 67.0 cm(2), P = 0.455), and operative times were noted between the single-perforator-based and multiple-perforator-based flap groups. The flap rotation arc was larger in the single-perforator-based flap group than in the multiple-perforator-based flap group; however, the difference in the rotation arc was not significant (99.2° vs. 55.5°, respectively; P = 0.199). Two patients had total flap necrosis and one had partial flap necrosis in the single-perforator-based flap group. None of flap necrosis was noted in the multiple-perforator-based flap group; however, no significant differences in major complications were noted between the two groups. All donor sites underwent primary closure. CONCLUSION: This is the first clinical patient-matched research that considered the number of perforators and the rotation arc in applying perforator-based fasciocutaneous flaps in wound reconstruction. The results showed that the number of perforators is not the determinant factor of surgical outcome of the use of perforator-based fasciocutaneous flaps in pressure sore reconstruction. Thus, whether a single- or a multiple-perforator-based fasciocutaneous flap is used for flap perfusion does not jeopardize the operation. These results emphasize the reliability and convenience of using freestyle design of perforator-based flaps for pressure sore reconstruction. The design and clinical utility of the flaps have the advantage of being versatile. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]