These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Integration of multivariate empirical mode decomposition and independent component analysis for fetal ECG separation from abdominal signals.
    Author: Thanaraj P, Roshini M, Balasubramanian P.
    Journal: Technol Health Care; 2016 Nov 14; 24(6):783-794. PubMed ID: 27315149.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: The fetal electrocardiogram (FECG) signals are essential to monitor the health condition of the baby. Fetal heart rate (FHR) is commonly used for diagnosing certain abnormalities in the formation of the heart. Usually, non-invasive abdominal electrocardiogram (AbECG) signals are obtained by placing surface electrodes in the abdomen region of the pregnant woman. AbECG signals are often not suitable for the direct analysis of fetal heart activity. Moreover, the strength and magnitude of the FECG signals are low compared to the maternal electrocardiogram (MECG) signals. The MECG signals are often superimposed with the FECG signals that make the monitoring of FECG signals a difficult task. OBJECTIVE: Primary goal of the paper is to separate the fetal electrocardiogram (FECG) signals from the unwanted maternal electrocardiogram (MECG) signals. METHOD: A multivariate signal processing procedure is proposed here that combines the Multivariate Empirical Mode Decomposition (MEMD) and Independent Component Analysis (ICA). RESULTS: The proposed method is evaluated with clinical abdominal signals taken from three pregnant women (N= 3) recorded during the 38-41 weeks of the gestation period. The number of fetal R-wave detected (NEFQRS), the number of unwanted maternal peaks (NMQRS), the number of undetected fetal R-wave (NUFQRS) and the FHR detection accuracy quantifies the performance of our method. Clinical investigation with three test subjects shows an overall detection accuracy of 92.8%. CONCLUSION: Comparative analysis with benchmark signal processing method such as ICA suggests the noteworthy performance of our method.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]