These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Reducing the dose of CT of the paranasal sinuses: potential of an iterative reconstruction algorithm.
    Author: Schaafs LA, Lenk J, Hamm B, Niehues SM.
    Journal: Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(7):20160127. PubMed ID: 27351346.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility and image quality of low-dose CT of the paranasal sinuses using iterative reconstruction with adaptive-iterative dose reduction in three dimensions (AIDR 3D) in comparison with conventional image protocols of older scanner generations. METHODS: Sinus CT scans of 136 patients were assessed retrospectively. Patients underwent CT either with low-dose settings (Protocol A: 80 kV, 30 mA s; Protocol B: 120 kV, 15 mA s or C: 80 kV, 90 mA s) reconstructed using AIDR 3D (Protocols A and B) or filtered back projection (FBP) (Protocol C) or with standard dose (Protocol D: 120 kV, 80 mA s) and FBP. Image quality was assessed in consensus by two blinded readers scoring the diagnostic image quality (from 1 = excellent to 5 = non-diagnostic) and conspicuity of important anatomic landmarks (from 0 = not visible to 2 = completely visible; maximum score of 16 points) as well as osseous structures (maximum score of 12 points). Dose-length product, effective dose (ED), CT dose index and scan length were retrieved for each scan and compared. RESULTS: Mean ED could be lowered by 82% when using Protocol A. The best image quality was found using Protocol B (mean score = 2.1 ± 0.51). Conspicuity of relevant anatomic landmarks was best with Protocol A (mean score = 11.97 ± 1.88). Protocol B provided the highest conspicuity of osseous structures (mean score = 8.27 ± 1.58). Image noise was highest in images obtained using Protocol A. CONCLUSIONS: AIDR 3D allows a significant dose reduction while maintaining a good diagnostic image quality and conspicuity of relevant anatomic structures.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]