These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Validity of the language development survey in infants born preterm. Author: Beaulieu-Poulin C, Simard MN, Babakissa H, Lefebvre F, Luu TM. Journal: Early Hum Dev; 2016 Jul; 98():11-6. PubMed ID: 27351348. Abstract: BACKGROUND: Preterm infants are at greater risk of language delay. Early identification of language delay is essential to improve functional outcome in these children. AIM: To examine the concurrent validity of Rescorla's Language Development Survey and the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (Bayley-III) at 18months corrected age in preterm infants. STUDY DESIGN: Test accuracy study. PARTICIPANTS: 189 preterm infants born <29weeks were assessed at 18months. OUTCOME MEASURES: The Language Development Survey, a parent-reported screening instrument, was administered in French concurrently with the Language Scales of the Bayley-III. Receiver-Operating-Characteristics curves were used to determine optimal cut-off score on the Language Development Survey to identify Bayley-III score <85. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and κ coefficient were calculated. RESULTS: Using Rescorla's original cut-off scores of ≤10 words for boys and ≤24 for girls, sensitivity was 76% and 88% for boys and girls, respectively, and specificity was 73% and 52% for boys and girls, respectively, in identifying language delay as per the Bayley-III. The optimal threshold was ≤10 words for both boys and girls. In girls, lowering the cut-off score decreased sensitivity (79%), but improved specificity (82%), thus lowering the number of false-positives. CONCLUSION: Our findings support using the Language Development Survey as an expressive language screener in preterm infants.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]